Sunday, August 28, 2016

The Real Hollywood Blacklist

was of non-Communists before the HUAC hearings ever took place.

notice the name John Wayne mentions at the end of this video, Morrie Ryskind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR9nIMOrqy4&feature=youtu.be&t=5m20s

who was Morrie Ryskind?  a Jew, a Pulitzer Prize winning screenwriter, a composer, a card carrying member of the Socialist Party of America.  what happened to Morrie when he left the Left?  it's obvious enough, he has no, NONE, ZERO Hollywood credits after 1945.  the HUAC Hollywood hearings didn't happen until 1947.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee#Hollywood_blacklist

http://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-category/218

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morrie_Ryskind#Filmography

now, Morrie didn't die until 1985.  so, for 40 years we're supposed to believe that no work could be found in Hollywood for an award winning, money making Jew?

and we're supposed to feel sorry for Communists who were supporting the murder of tens of millions of people through their support of Mao and Stalin ... because they had to drive cabs for a couple of years?

Black Knighting: 13 Amendment Constitutional slavery edition

so, if it should ever happen that you find yourself a victim of some sort of felony, i suggest that when it comes to the sentencing phase of the trial that you request that the judge honor your 13th Amendment Right to hold the miscreant as a slave for what would have been the duration of his prison term.

present this as a method to help reduce over crowding in the prisons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
"Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."


when the inevitable sputtering and blathering ensues, note that the Constitutional prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment" was contained in the 8th Amendment and that, thus, the Constitution does not consider Slavery to be either cruel or unusual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. "

Saturday, August 27, 2016

The real Time Travel problem that Skiffy has never resolved?

SPACE!

"What", you ask, "how can Space be a problem for time travel?"

it's pretty straightforward.

the Earth rotates about it's axis.  rotational velocity at the equator is over 1,000mph.  of course, this rotational velocity will decrease as you approach the poles, but even if you were time traveling from a position at one of the poles,

... there are larger issues.

 the Earth orbits the sun at approximately 66,600mph.  if you want to travel one day into the past, you have to also go 1,598,400 miles back along Earth's orbit around the Sun.

... there are larger issues.

speaking of the Sun, it's also moving ( ruh roh ).  well gosh bob, how fast is the Sun moving?  Wikipedia says the Sun is moving ~220 kilometers ... per second.  which is 792,000 kph.  which, for us hick 'Muricans, is a little under a half million miles per hour at 492,126 mph.  if you want to travel one year into the past, you have to go 4,311,023,760 miles back along the Sun's orbit around the core of the Milky Way. did i mention the Milky Way?  oh crap,

... there are larger issues.

  the Milky Way has a velocity relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background of 552 kms.  which is 1,987,200 kph or 1,234,789 mph.   if you travel ten years into the past, the Milky Way has traveled  108,167,516,400 miles.  if you go back 600 years you are more than a Light Year away from where we are today.  yes, that's right, Columbus sailed the ocean blue 524 years ago and almost a Light Year from where we are today.

suddenly, time travel back to the age of the dinosaurs, billions of years ago, seems kind of absurd.  given that this would also involve translating yourself across millions of Light Years of space, orienting yourself to the Milky Way, to the orbital position of the Sun, to the orbital position of the Earth AND referenced properly to the angular position relative to the Earth's core.

otherwise, you'll be sucking the vacuum of space.  which doesn't really give you much opportunity to play with dinosaurs.

obviously, the same Spacial problem applies to any time travel to the future as well.  which points up the absurdity of HG Wells, "The Time Machine".


ps - there is, of course, one way to solve most of these problems:
rehabilitate the Ptolemiac Model

The Truth about multiculturalism


so, how is it that suddenly, throughout the West and subsequent to 1950, that multiculturalism and unlimited immigration became a universal Western values?  how is it that countries as widely separated ( geographically, linguistically, historically, religiously ) as Australia, Sweden, Germany, Canada, Belgium and the United States should all of a sudden have decided that they could no longer enforce border control laws and regulations?

well, this Person of Color ( @ 14:10 )  will be happy to tell the truth about democracy and multiculturalism:
"Your democracy is anti-democracy.  It is only for you.  Because you are racists."

funny, i could have sworn America was founded as a Republic.  since when did Democracy become one of our "principles"?

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Slavery still Lawful in the United States

some will tell you that the US Federal Government outlawed slavery with the adoption of the 13th Amendment.

they are flagrantly lying to you.  for the 13th Amendment itself tells you exactly how slavery may be practiced.   here is the text of the 13th Amendment, in toto:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Text
"Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."


you notice the second clause in section 1?  Slavery and Involuntary Servitude are both acceptable punishments for conviction of a crime.  by Federal Law, neither Slavery nor Involuntary Servitude are considered "cruel" or "unusual" punishments.


fucking lol.

of course, the 13th is one of the Reconstruction Amendments and is inadmissible as Law simply due to forced coercion of the Southern States ( invasion, murder, rape, theft from the Civil War and Reconstruction and withholding of their Rights as States until they subjugated themselves to the adoption of amendments to which not even all of the Northern States agreed ) to ratify these Amendments.

i just find it hilarious that even when you give the Yankees illegal Amendments to practice as Law they still can't get slavery banned.  even though they lie and say they did.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Black county sheriff declares that the Free Shit Army is

incompatible with 'ordered Liberty' and our Constitutional means of government, asserts that he is bound by law and his sworn oath to protect both life AND property.  which means that he has no intention of allowing the Free Shit Army room to riot and loot.

i think i like this guy.

A soothing musical interlude


Cuck Cinema: Valdez is Coming ( 1971 )

https://www.spaghetti-western.net/index.php/Valdez_is_Coming_Review

first, a disclaimer:
i like a lot of old movies in general and think that Lancaster has done some excellent work.  it's part of the reason why i watched this movie when it popped up.  which makes this movie that much more disappointing.  i'm not sure how much the movie script varies from the original book but if it is faithful plotwise then this is prime evidence that Elmore Leonard is also pretty cucked.  which is even more aggravating.


the major point about this movie that raised my hackles was the resolution scene:
https://youtu.be/hVWbwqhppHk?t=2m5s

without knowing anything else about the plot, this scene is clearly constructed for the explicit purpose of the humiliating the primary White Male character in the film.

it gets much worse when the plot is viewed in it's totality.

EVERY White character in this film, without exception, is a piece of shit.

Frank Tanner, the primary antagonist, opens the movie getting a black man killed due to a false accusation of murder and desertion and closes the film with that act of cowardice and rejection by the woman as seen above.   personal guilt and public embarrassment over his so obviously having desired his best friend's wife is his motivation for absurdly over-pursuing whomever he suspects of being the miscreant who murdered his friend.

Gay Erin, the widow who is fucking around with her husband's best friend a mere month (?) after his murder is the linchpin of the whole plot.  you see, the accusation that a Black man had murdered her husband is a bald faced lie, which she concocted in order to conceal the fact that she had murdered her husband herself.  being a cucked movie, she is of course completely forgiven for, at best, a second degree murder.

Gay Erin's deceased husband, never seen on screen, is accused by both Frank and Gay of having beaten her.  okay, so he's an abusive asshole.  the fact remains that she could have, you know, divorced him even back then.  the fact that she has no injuries whatsoever demonstrates that whatever he was supposed to be doing was clearly not debilitating or life threatening.  given the short time frame of the movie since his murder and Gay's complete lack of visible bruises it seems unlikely that there could have been much force involved at all.

RL Davis is the quasi-homicidal, cowardly young idiot.  he is the catalyst for forcing Valdez to kill Rincon, the Black man.  he is the only White character permitted one small saving grace though, he frees Valdez from the cross.

the town fathers first allow Frank Tanner to run amuck pursuing the falsely accused Black, then deflect all responsibility for his death onto Valdez himself and refuse to show any mercy to the pregnant Apache widow who was left behind.  they're Bourgeois, you see.

the White Sheriff is a wholly owned apparatchik of Tanner's gun running operation.


every 'good' character in this movie ( apart from Gay Erin, who is forgiven the crime of murder because White woman vagina ) is a person of color.

Valdez is the avenging angel who, though long suffering at the beginning, turns into the Terminator at the end of the movie.

El Segundo begins the movie simply as a henchman of Tanner but, due to his personal integrity and honor, turns his coat at the end of the film and aligns with his fellow Proletarians against "The Man".

Diego is the faithful sidekick even through great personal pain and sacrifice.

the Black dude had been honorably discharged from the military and died simply due to a false accusation.

the pregnant Apache wife is given a scene in which she stoically endures getting shot at without flinching.


so, as one can see, this film fully adheres to the perspective of the Communist Manifesto.

apart from that, this is a moderately interesting film.  the last escape scene is quite different, first Valdez is positioned between two horses in a kind of Superman flying pose, then, after Segundo shoots the near side horse and Valdez transitions up to a normal mount Segundo shoots the second mount.  as Valdez crashes it falls across the course of Gay's horse causing her to go down.

it's kind of shocking to remember that Hollywood movies used to be made without much concern for the well being of the animals.  i'd be shocked if at least one of those horses didn't get put down.





irony:  the three primary Hispanic roles in this film ( Bob Valdez, El Segundo and Diego ) are all played by White ( Burt Lancaster and Barton Heyman(?) ) or Jewish ( Frank Silvera ) men in Beanerface.  fucking lol.