Thursday, January 19, 2017

No real church in the US is a 501(c)(3) organization

this amazing assertion can be found here

http://hushmoney.org/501c3-facts.htm
" ...it is completely unnecessary for any church to apply for tax-exempt status."

now, anyone can assert anything on the Interwebs.

the disturbing thing is that the IRS fact sheets ... say the exact same thing.

https://www.irs.gov/publications/p557/ch03.html
"Some organizations are not required to file Form 1023 or 1023-EZ. These include:
  • Churches, interchurch organizations of local units of a church, conventions or associations of churches, or integrated auxiliaries of a church, such as a men's or women's organization, religious school, mission society, or youth group.
  • Any organization (other than a private foundation) normally having annual gross receipts of not more than $5,000 (see Gross receipts test, later).

These organizations are exempt automatically if they meet the requirements of section 501(c)(3)."


therefore, NO CHURCH is 'required' to file Form 1023 or to be licensed as a 501(c)(3) in order to be exempt from, not only paying taxes, but FILING tax paperwork.





and any pastor who tells you otherwise IS LYING.


MMA fighters getting boxing licenses: Why?

McGregor has had a California boxing license for several months now.

http://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/18179595/what-conor-mcgregor-obtaining-boxing-license-means-ufc-mma

Nate Diaz is filing for a Nevada boxing license.

http://www.cbssports.com/mma/news/nate-diaz-joins-conor-mcgregor-in-applying-for-nevada-boxing-license/

so, is this JUST about Nate and Conor branching out into other combat sports?  is it just about them finding new ways to fight each other?  or maybe so they can both fight Mayweather?

maybe.

or maybe there's a little bit MORE to the situation than that.  you see, MMA fighters are *not* covered by the Federal Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act.  while boxers ( as you might expect from the name ) are.

what implications could Boxing Reform Act apply to Conor and Nate ... and any other MMA fighter who signs up for a boxing license?

welllllllll, let's let Randy Couture break it down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xulBmbQHscY



so Conor and Nate are now, technically, covered by the Federal Boxing Reform Act.  thus, Conor and Nate ... could possibly ... use this law to both force the UFC to disclose their financials AND break the exclusivity contracts that the UFC has on them.

do you think maybe Conor has made enough money that he can afford to litigate this?

do you think maybe Nate wouldn't love a chance to join forces with Conor in this kind of a suit?

is McGregor ever going to fight Mayweather?  i don't know.  it would be a massive payday for both of these men, so it COULD happen just for that reason.

but Conor is a pretty smart man.  and it just MAY be possible that he was manufacturing the beef with Mayweather as a feint to provide cover and justification for his applying for a boxing license because he's been intending to use US Federal law to break his UFC exclusivity contract for a year now.

and if that's what's going on?  we can all cry crocodile tears for those Hollywood sharks at WME-IMG.  because it looks like the Fertitta's grabbed the ripcord and punched out at the absolute top of the market and left the Jews at WME holding the bag on all the liabilities when this blows up.

because if all the fighters contracted to UFC ( as well as all the other MMA orgs ) figure out that they can flip the bird to the UFC about fight exclusivity simply be getting boxing licenses?  what assets does UFC actually have?  they've got the broadcast deals ... but without fighters, they've got nothing to broadcast.

how would you short WME talent agency?





Let the corn be all one sheaf

so, here we have a little video detailing the dissociation and inability to blend in ... of Chinese children ... in England.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GNrlqLHJYE



that darn Magic Dirt, why OH WHY doesn't it work as advertised.


the title of this post is one of the lines from Rudyard Kipling's poem, "The Stranger"
http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/stranger.html

The Stranger within my gate,
  He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk--
  I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
  But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
   They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
   They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
   When we go to buy or sell.
   
The Stranger within my gates,
  He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control--
  What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
   Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
   Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
  And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
   They think of the likes of me.

This was my father's belief
  And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
  And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
  By bitter bread and wine.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

"Your parents did a shit job raising you", you stupid Liberals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj_xUX8zQx0



i'm seriously starting to have a hard time telling if Jimmy Dore is a stealth Alt-Righter pretending to be a Socialist or not.

he's starting to put up a LOT of these videos where he's pointing out SJWs lying, projecting and doubling down.


so, anyways, i have poll up in the Ars Technica Bizarro Lounge asking how you would remediate this shit job of parenting.

http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1370815

Friday, January 13, 2017

A Progressive with a modicum of integrity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMZLf3AUz_s



Jimmy Dore has been slam dunking a bunch of the retarded shit that the Establishment Left has been doing.

i'm not referencing him because i trust him ( he is of the Left after all ), i'm just pointing out how much of a Lying Sack of Shit you have to be to try to use these manufactured stories.

More chick fighting

kind of.

remember when Ronda Rousey was the top of the world, claiming she could beat up Floyd Mayweather and Cain Velasquez?

well, Ronda fights at 135lb.  Cain weighs upwards of 240lb ( UFC Heavyweights only have to weigh less than 265lb, so Cain doesn't do any weight cutting ).

this is an example of what happens in a grappling match between two MEN, one of whom weighs ~240 and the other weighing ~145.  true, neither of these men has much grappling experience.  but that's not the point.  the point is to observe that the larger man can do a one arm curl of the smaller man's body weight.

this is the kind of thing that would happen to Ronda were she to attempt to fight Cain with no handicap.  yes, Ronda probably walks around closer to 170 so she's probably bigger than Shane ... but men have more upper body strength than women at any given weight so Shane is probably a pretty accurate representation of the kind of performance she would give.

go to 9 min 40 sec to see the grappling.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O14yjsulv7w&feature=youtu.be&t=9m40s



now, imagine that Cain isn't simply trying to grapple her, he's also going to be punching the shit out of her.  and he's bigger than this body builder guy.  and Cain knows a little something something about grappling.

if, and this is a big IF, Ronda is ever dumb enough to climb into a cage with a male
Heavyweight THEN she's going to become a greasy red spot on the floor ... provided the Heavyweight actually tries to hurt her.  the idea that she's somehow going to armbar a MAN this big is beyond absurd.

Racist Nazi Literally Hitler hires multiple Black Men

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CZz2SVhAc


Thursday, December 29, 2016

A study in neuro-deviant deflection

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIawS_t_ZNk



notice all the false equivalencies and lies Weiner tells here:
1 - Weiner has *asked* EVERY prospective voter to judge him, by the very act of asking them to support him
2 - this is the United States, WE are judged by our PEERS here.  demanding 'superiority' from your interlocutor is a canard
3 - notice how Weiner cowers behind children, hectoring the other man for what he said in front of them.  this is particularly delicious now that we know that Weiner sends dick pics to under age girls and uses his infant son as a stage prop in them
4 - Weiner hides behind his rabbi
5 - Weiner claims that his 'service' to the community excuses his behavior
6 - Weiner expresses NO REMORSE FOR HIS OWN ACTIONS at any point



this is a case study in the interpersonal tactics and attacks which neuro-deviants commonly use.

they prey upon your assumption of their goodwill and integrity.




Wednesday, December 28, 2016

The International Pedophile conspiracy is real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xufh8XysHJ4


notice how the faggot at the end disclaims all responsibility for HIS OWN molestation of the boy he adopted?

notice how facilely he claims to be feeling threatened and oppressed at the end of the interview?

Libtards are back to trying to scare us about nuclear winter

http://arstechnica.com/the-multiverse/2016/12/diving-into-the-unthinkable-cold-truths-of-a-nuclear-war/

because, you know, we troglodytic lunatics haven't figured out that actually dropping nuclear bombs all over the place might be a bad idea.  it's a GOOD THING we've got Progressive , college degreed pompous shits around to check our fronting, otherwise we might get out of hand.

which is why it was Republican nominee for president, Hillary Clinton, who was threatening to start a war with Russia.

wait ... that last sentence doesn't seem right somehow?