Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Crazy Eyes misrepresents the issue of Donatism

this is the rebuke i sent her:

Donatism was NOT about requiring the priests to be "perfect", and it is embarrassing that you would try to draw an Equivalence this False.
Donatism was the statement that Priests / Bishops who had committed APOSTASY, denied Christ in public and defiled the Scripture were no longer fit or mete to have or be an Authority in the Church.
but, of course, to be a Catholic and accept a celibate and unmarried clergy required disposing of every New Testament criteria to hold Church authority.  so it doesn't really surprise me that you would also dispose of the requirement that the man under consideration for the priesthood should have an excellent reputation.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;

failing to grasp the crown of Martydom does not disqualify you from Salvation or from MEMBERSHIP in the Church, or from the possibility of Reconciliation with the Church at a later date.  committing Apostasy to avoid Martyrdom most certainly WOULD be a disqualifying condition to join the Clergy.
remember, Peter never denied the Divinity of Christ.  he denied that he was an associate of Christ.  that's not the same thing.
further, there is a significant DIFFERENCE between a Priest practicing secret pedophilia and a Priest publicly denying the Divinity of Christ and the Efficacy of the Word and the Sacrifice of the Cross.
in the second situation, the Laity know full well of the crime.  and by knowing, and accepting such a Criminal as having authority over them, in DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO SCRIPTURE, they themselves take partial responsibility for his vile act.  thus defiling the Bride of Christ.

here is the link to the podcast in question.  i quit listening as soon as i heard her claim that Donatists required the Priests to "perfect".  she goes off the rails within the first five minutes of her monologue.

another reason why Ann cannot admit that the Church had erred in this issue is the obvious one:  it's an absolute disqualification of the Catholic doctrine of "Infallibility". 

Ann admits that the 'Doctors of the Church' and all of the Popes have been in extreme error for 1700 years
all of the other Heresies which the Roman Catholic Church has promulgated as 'Magisterium' since ( for direct contradiction of the instructions laid out in the NT ) fail as a matter of course.

Monday, September 25, 2017

Fail Faster!

hard not to love guys who can have a sense of humor about their work.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Some call it Treason

others might think it was Henry Kissinger's plan all along.

boy, it's a good thing the Conservatives elected Nixon back in 1968.

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you the next President of the United States of America!

Mr. Assman T. von Fangboner

Mr. Fangboner takes all of his names from public streets in these United States, demonstrating his unwavering affection and loyalty to the nation of his birth.

Assman Road is located in Mishicot Wisconsin

Fangboner Road is from Fremont Ohio

perhaps you think that the middle initial is an homage to Captain James Tiberius Kirk?  you'd be wrong.

there is a Titman Road in both NC and NJ.

some other street names of interest:

Brohard Road, where hard Bros go to Bro harder ( a Chuck Tingle favorite )

Hitler Street, in Kimmel IN ( no, i have no idea why this would be here )

Whoops! I missed the return

guess i'll have to catch it next year.

Saturday, September 9, 2017

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Joe Arpiao did nothing wrong

the hell with shooting reporters in the street, they keep this shit up and Trump could Kaziglu Bey the entire 9th Circuit bench and we'll all cheer.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

The Art of the Smear and Libel within UK News Media

i particularly like the tactic of committing Libel under a secondary corporate entity, permitting that entity to lapse, and then creating a new corporate entity so that you may commit new crimes with minimal exposure.

Rob could probably use exposure to Vox's SJWAL book.

Friday, August 25, 2017

What if I told you that German National Socialism predates Mussolini's Fascism by more than a century?

what if i told you, that German National Socialism owes nothing whatsoever to Italian Fascism?

what if i told you, that every Leftist who has ever read the Communist Manifesto knows this?

what if i told you, that the origins of German National Socialism were described by no less a personage than Karl Marx?  written in 1847, and describing a German National Socialism which originates in ( according to Marx ) a perversion of the French Socialism from the 1700s, predating not merely Mussolini, but Marx ( born 1818 ) himself.

what if i told you, that "German National Socialism" is the original and True Socialism ... according to the Communist Manifesto?
"C. German or “True” Socialism
The Socialist and Communist literature of France, a literature that originated under the pressure of a bourgeoisie in power, and that was the expressions of the struggle against this power, was introduced into Germany at a time when the bourgeoisie, in that country, had just begun its contest with feudal absolutism. 
German philosophers, would-be philosophers, and beaux esprits (men of letters), eagerly seized on this literature, only forgetting, that when these writings immigrated from France into Germany, French social conditions had not immigrated along with them. In contact with German social conditions, this French literature lost all its immediate practical significance and assumed a purely literary aspect. Thus, to the German philosophers of the Eighteenth Century, the demands of the first French Revolution were nothing more than the demands of “Practical Reason” in general, and the utterance of the will of the revolutionary French bourgeoisie signified, in their eyes, the laws of pure Will, of Will as it was bound to be, of true human Will generally.
The work of the German literati consisted solely in bringing the new French ideas into harmony with their ancient philosophical conscience, or rather, in annexing the French ideas without deserting their own philosophic point of view.
This annexation took place in the same way in which a foreign language is appropriated, namely, by translation.
It is well known how the monks wrote silly lives of Catholic Saints over the manuscripts on which the classical works of ancient heathendom had been written. The German literati reversed this process with the profane French literature. They wrote their philosophical nonsense beneath the French original. For instance, beneath the French criticism of the economic functions of money, they wrote “Alienation of Humanity”, and beneath the French criticism of the bourgeois state they wrote “Dethronement of the Category of the General”, and so forth.
The introduction of these philosophical phrases at the back of the French historical criticisms, they dubbed “Philosophy of Action”, “True Socialism”, “German Science of Socialism”, “Philosophical Foundation of Socialism”, and so on.
The French Socialist and Communist literature was thus completely emasculated. And, since it ceased in the hands of the German to express the struggle of one class with the other, he felt conscious of having overcome “French one-sidedness” and of representing, not true requirements, but the requirements of Truth; not the interests of the proletariat, but the interests of Human Nature, of Man in general, who belongs to no class, has no reality, who exists only in the misty realm of philosophical fantasy.
This German socialism, which took its schoolboy task so seriously and solemnly, and extolled its poor stock-in-trade in such a mountebank fashion, meanwhile gradually lost its pedantic innocence.
The fight of the Germans, and especially of the Prussian bourgeoisie, against feudal aristocracy and absolute monarchy, in other words, the liberal movement, became more earnest.
By this, the long-wished for opportunity was offered to “True” Socialism of confronting the political movement with the Socialist demands, of hurling the traditional anathemas against liberalism, against representative government, against bourgeois competition, bourgeois freedom of the press, bourgeois legislation, bourgeois liberty and equality, and of preaching to the masses that they had nothing to gain, and everything to lose, by this bourgeois movement. German Socialism forgot, in the nick of time, that the French criticism, whose silly echo it was, presupposed the existence of modern bourgeois society, with its corresponding economic conditions of existence, and the political constitution adapted thereto, the very things those attainment was the object of the pending struggle in Germany.
To the absolute governments, with their following of parsons, professors, country squires, and officials, it served as a welcome scarecrow against the threatening bourgeoisie.
It was a sweet finish, after the bitter pills of flogging and bullets, with which these same governments, just at that time, dosed the German working-class risings.
While this “True” Socialism thus served the government as a weapon for fighting the German bourgeoisie, it, at the same time, directly represented a reactionary interest, the interest of German Philistines. In Germany, the petty-bourgeois class, a relic of the sixteenth century, and since then constantly cropping up again under the various forms, is the real social basis of the existing state of things.
To preserve this class is to preserve the existing state of things in Germany. The industrial and political supremacy of the bourgeoisie threatens it with certain destruction — on the one hand, from the concentration of capital; on the other, from the rise of a revolutionary proletariat. “True” Socialism appeared to kill these two birds with one stone. It spread like an epidemic.
The robe of speculative cobwebs, embroidered with flowers of rhetoric, steeped in the dew of sickly sentiment, this transcendental robe in which the German Socialists wrapped their sorry “eternal truths”, all skin and bone, served to wonderfully increase the sale of their goods amongst such a public.
And on its part German Socialism recognised, more and more, its own calling as the bombastic representative of the petty-bourgeois Philistine.
It proclaimed the German nation to be the model nation, and the German petty Philistine to be the typical man. To every villainous meanness of this model man, it gave a hidden, higher, Socialistic interpretation, the exact contrary of its real character. It went to the extreme length of directly opposing the “brutally destructive” tendency of Communism, and of proclaiming its supreme and impartial contempt of all class struggles. With very few exceptions, all the so-called Socialist and Communist publications that now (1847) circulate in Germany belong to the domain of this foul and enervating literature.(3)"

what if i told you that
about Political philosophy and history is a Lie.

because your parents allowed Communists to control your education.